Top court adviser says individuals can sue EU governments over dirty air
A top EU court adviser has said that individuals should be able to demand compensation from EU governments over harm they suffer as a result of illegal air pollution.
The opinion, by Advocate General Kokott, was issued to guide an ongoing court case in France, in which a citizen is asking for €21m in compensation for damage to his health caused by air pollution.
Kokott’s opinion confirms that people have an individual right to clean air and can claim damages based on that, if certain tests have been met.
She also highlights the particular impact of illegally dirty air on structurally underprivileged communities.
Environmental lawyers have hailed this latest step towards protecting the right to healthy air for people across the EU.
ClientEarth lawyer Irmina Kotiuk said: ‘Advocate General Kokott has reiterated that air quality has profound links with fundamental rights – and when those rights are infringed, people have the right to take their government to task and demand compensation for harm they suffer.
‘Individuals have the right to breathe clean and healthy air and there are specific EU laws designed to guarantee this. But across the bloc, governments are failing people, with lifelong impacts, and shocking rates of premature deaths. This legal confirmation that there are routes to hold those in power to account is a major breakthrough in the fight for clean and healthy air.’
The EU is in the process of updating the Ambient Air Quality Directive (AAQD) – its key air pollution law. ClientEarth’s lawyers say that the revised law should include a clear legal framework to clarify how people can hold their governments accountable for damage wrought on their lives by illegal air pollution.
Irmina Kotiuk said: ‘People everywhere in the EU are suffering the cumulative harm of constant exposure to air pollution. We need to move past an era where this is somehow considered acceptable. Legal mechanisms to hold those in charge accountable are major part of the route forward.’
In related news, Irmina Kotiuk, Senior Lawyer and Fundamental Rights Specialist in the clean air programme at environmental law charity ClientEarth, explains how human rights law can be used to fight for clean air.
Photo by Pétrin Express
Interesting. So is there anything such as “legal pollution”? How is it going to be determined that somone has been exposed to an illegal level? For how long? And what counts as an illegal level? Yearly average NO2? If one person in a certain town can claim, and perhaps win, won’t everyone else in that town also want compensation? Would it be ongoing if the pollution level cannot be borught down? A financial allowance for living in a bad air zone? Then other citizens in other towns would want the same. And so would anyone living beside an incinerator, for example, if high levels of pollution could be established there. Then it would depend on the measurements taken and by whom. This scenario could get very complicated. I shall have to read exactly what Irmina Kotium has to say. What if the air pollution is coming from a neigbouring country? How bad is the air in Ukraine right now?
I wonder how this will help in the UK ? We are no onger in the EU ; are our human rights now diminished ? At least, in England and Wales, the new Environmental Law has been passed and promises better protection.In Scotland, the Scottish Government has still to pass it’s own version. yet another consulative committee has been set up to review the existing act, yet more meetings have been held since last May (2021) but we are no further forward. And the existing laws are not enforced anyway. My present authority has a 48 hour window to respond to pollution reports . They have a weekend service that starts at 6pm on Saturdays and Sundays. And they wontn attend when it’s dark as they have to see the pollution source. Effectively woodburners and fire pits are going gung -ho all weekend in the autumn and winter and spring , burning whatever they wish with impunity, eevn in a designated smoke control area.