ClientEarth hails â€˜historicâ€™ ruling today (May 1) in long-running legal battle between the campaign group and government
The UK is in breach of EU air quality limits and failing its legal duty to tackle air pollution, the Supreme Court ruled today (May 1).
After a long-running series of court battles, campaign group ClientEarth had its appeal allowed by the UK Supreme Court, which ruled that the government had failed to put sufficient measures in place to comply with EU air pollution limits.
ClientEarth chief executive James Thornton described todayâ€™s judgment as an â€œhistoric rulingâ€.
The campaign group had previously expected a decision on the case, which was heard on March 7 2013, before Easter (see airqualitynews.com story).
The UK Supreme Court has now referred the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), as it said it raises â€˜difficult issuesâ€™ of European law. The CJEU could decide to force the government to submit plans that would see the UK meet legal air quality limits.
Todayâ€™s judgment, handed down by Justice Lord Carnworth, states that â€˜the way is open to immediate enforcement action at national or European levelâ€™. The case was also heard by Justice Lords Hope, Mance, Clarke and Sumption.
Under current government plans, 16 out of 43 areas or zones in the UK are not due to meet EU legal limits for nitrogen dioxide until 2020, while Greater London is not expected to meet these limits until 2025.
The last possible extension from the original 2010 deadline to meet these limits â€“ when 40 of the 43 zones were in exceedance â€“ is 2015. However, the government has not submitted an application to the European Commission for an extension to this deadline, and it is on this issue that ClientEarth launched their appeal to the UK Supreme Court.
Instead of submitting an extension application, â€˜The Secretary of State submitted air quality plans under article 23 to the European Commission in order to demonstrate that the exceedance periods for those 16 zones and agglomerations would be kept as short as possible.
According to the judgment, both Client Earth and the government are now invited to make submissions to the Supreme Court as to the precise form of the questions to go to the CJEU.
Todayâ€™s ruling states: â€˜The Supreme Court allows the appeal to the extent that it grants a declaration that there has been a breach of article 13 of the Air Quality Directive. The proceedings are stayed whilst the other issues concerning the Air Quality Directive are referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The parties are requested to file submissions as to the precise form of the questions to be referred.â€™
Commenting on todayâ€™s ruling, ClientEarth chief executive James Thornton, said: â€œThis historic ruling marks a turning point in the fight for clean air and will pile the pressure on Owen Paterson [UK environment minister]. Faced with court action on two fronts, he must now come up with an ambitious plan to protect people from carcinogenic diesel fumes. Until now, his only policy has been lobbying in Europe to try and weaken air pollution laws.â€
â€œThe Supreme Court recognised that this case has broader implications for EU environmental law: The government canâ€™t flout environmental law with impunity. If the Government breaks the law, citizens can demand justice and the courts must act.â€
The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) declined to comment specifically on the case, but a spokeswoman said: â€œAir quality has improved significantly in recent decades and almost all of the UK meets EU air quality limits for all pollutants.â€
Commenting on the Supreme Court ruling today, chair of the London Assemblyâ€™s environment committee, Murad Qureshi, said: â€œTodayâ€™s decision should be a wakeup call for the government and the Mayor. It is unacceptable that while 4,000 Londoners die prematurely each year because of air pollution, Boris Johnsonâ€™s response has been to kick serious action that would tackle the problem down the line for a future Mayor to deal with.
â€œAir pollution is the second biggest public health risk in the capital. That London will not meet legal limits on NO2 pollution until 2025 shows exactly how much of a priority the Mayor gave the issue during his first term.â€
Also commenting on todayâ€™s judgment, Friends of the Earth campaigner, Jenny Bates, said: â€œThis is a significant judgement that ministers must not ignore. The UKâ€™s attitude to air pollution is a national scandal â€“ thousands of people die prematurely every year because of poor air quality.
â€œWe urge ministers to take urgent action to tackle this crisis, including scrapping plans to build more roads.â€